Comparisons /

Cogito v2.1 671B vs Deepseek V3.1 NVFP4

Cogito v2.1 671B is not currently in the Allocate serving catalog, so this page lists no prices for it: every price on this site comes from the live catalog.

C Cogito v2.1 671B Deepseek V3.1 NVFP4
LabDeep CogitoDeepSeek
AccessNot served on AllocateOpen weights
Context windown/a128K tokens
List price, inputNot served$0.6 / M tokens
List price, outputNot served$1.7 / M tokens
Cached inputn/an/a
LicenseNot listedMIT
Fine-tunableYesYes

Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-09-12.

Choose Cogito v2.1 671B for

  • Long reasoning chains
  • Open-weight agents
  • Self-hosted reasoning
Cogito v2.1 671B details →

Choose Deepseek V3.1 NVFP4 for

  • Fine-tuning under a permissive license (MIT)
Deepseek V3.1 NVFP4 details →

Common questions

Which has the bigger context window?

Deepseek V3.1 NVFP4: 131,072 tokens (128K) against an unlisted window for Cogito v2.1 671B.

Can I fine-tune Cogito v2.1 671B or Deepseek V3.1 NVFP4?

Both publish open weights (Cogito v2.1 671B: Not listed; Deepseek V3.1 NVFP4: MIT), so both can be fine-tuned. On Allocate the trained weights stay inside your boundary and belong to you.

Related comparisons

Run the numbers on your workload

Or do not choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.