AllocateCogito v2.1 671B vs Llama 4 Scout
Cogito v2.1 671B is not currently in the Allocate serving catalog, so this page lists no prices for it: every price on this site comes from the live catalog.
C Cogito v2.1 671B
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 ScoutLabDeep CogitoMeta
AccessNot served on AllocateOpen weights
Context windown/a1M tokens
List price, inputNot served$0.18 / M tokens
List price, outputNot served$0.59 / M tokens
Cached inputn/an/a
LicenseNot listedLlama community
Fine-tunableYesYes
Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-09-12.
Choose Cogito v2.1 671B for
- Long reasoning chains
- Open-weight agents
- Self-hosted reasoning
Choose Llama 4 Scout for
- Whole-document reasoning
- High-volume extraction
- Fine-tuning under the Llama 4 license
Common questions
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,048,576 tokens (1M) against an unlisted window for Cogito v2.1 671B.
Can I fine-tune Cogito v2.1 671B or Llama 4 Scout?
Both publish open weights (Cogito v2.1 671B: Not listed; Llama 4 Scout: Llama community), so both can be fine-tuned. On Allocate the trained weights stay inside your boundary and belong to you.
Related comparisons
Cogito v2.1 671B vs Meta Llama 3.3 70B Instruct TurboLlama 4 Scout vs Meta Llama 3.3 70B Instruct TurboCogito v2.1 671B vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 4 Scout vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B InstructCogito v2.1 671B vs OpenAI GPT-OSS 20BLlama 4 Scout vs OpenAI GPT-OSS 20B
Run the numbers on your workload
Or do not choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.