Allocate
ModelsSign inTalk to sales
Comparisons

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput vs GLM 4.7 FP8

On provider list prices, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput costs $0.20 per million input tokens against $0.45 for GLM 4.7 FP8: 2.3x apart. Output is $0.60 against $2 (3.3x). On Allocate both bill at list plus the 7% transaction fee.

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 ThroughputG GLM 4.7 FP8
LabQwenZai Org
AccessOpen weightsOpen weights
Context window256K tokens198K tokens
List price, input$0.2 / M tokens$0.45 / M tokens
List price, output$0.6 / M tokens$2 / M tokens
Cached inputn/an/a
LicenseApache 2.0MIT
Fine-tunableYesYes

Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-08. Billed price is list plus the 7% transaction fee.

What the numbers say

Take 1,000,000 requests a month at 1,200 input and 350 output tokens each. That workload costs $450 a month on Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput and $1,240 on GLM 4.7 FP8 at list: a gap of $790, or 2.8x.

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput reads 256K tokens per request against 198K for GLM 4.7 FP8, 1.3x the window. That decides which one can take whole documents without splitting them.

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput$0.20$0.60
GLM 4.7 FP8$0.45$2
InputOutput

Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput for

  • The lower list price ($0.20 in / $0.60 out per M tokens)
  • The longer context window (256K vs 198K tokens)
  • Fine-tuning under a permissive license (Apache 2.0)
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput details

Choose GLM 4.7 FP8 for

  • Fine-tuning under a permissive license (MIT)
GLM 4.7 FP8 details

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput or GLM 4.7 FP8?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput, on this workload shape. At list prices it is $0.20/$0.60 per million tokens in and out against $0.45/$2 for GLM 4.7 FP8. Billed on Allocate: $0.21/$0.64 against $0.48/$2.14, list plus 7%.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput: 262,144 tokens (256K) against 202,752 (198K) for GLM 4.7 FP8.

Can I fine-tune Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput or GLM 4.7 FP8?

Both publish open weights (Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput: Apache 2.0; GLM 4.7 FP8: MIT), so both can be fine-tuned. On Allocate the trained weights stay inside your boundary and belong to you.

Related comparisons

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput vs Qwen3-VL-8B-InstructGLM 4.7 FP8 vs GLM 4.6 Fp8Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput vs Qwen3.5 397B A17bGLM 4.7 FP8 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17bQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 Throughput vs Qwen3.7 MaxGLM 4.7 FP8 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Run the numbers on your workload

LLM price comparisonAgent cost calculatorQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 FP8 ThroughputGLM 4.7 FP8

Or don’t choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.

Route both modelsTalk to sales