NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B NVFP4 vs Qwen 3.5
On provider list prices, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B NVFP4 costs $0.60 per million input tokens against $0.60 for Qwen 3.5: effectively level. Output is $3.60 against $3.60. On Allocate both bill at list plus the 7% transaction fee.
Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-08. Billed price is list plus the 7% transaction fee.
What the numbers say
Take 1,000,000 requests a month at 1,200 input and 350 output tokens each. That workload costs $1,980 a month on NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B NVFP4 and $1,980 on Qwen 3.5 at list: a gap of $0.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B NVFP4 reads 512K tokens per request against 256K for Qwen 3.5, 2.0x the window. That decides which one can take whole documents without splitting them.
Choose NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B NVFP4 for
- The longer context window (512K vs 256K tokens)
Choose Qwen 3.5 for
- Multilingual support agents
- Translation-adjacent workflows
- Fine-tuning under Apache 2.0
Common questions
Which is cheaper, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B NVFP4 or Qwen 3.5?
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B NVFP4, on this workload shape. At list prices it is $0.60/$3.60 per million tokens in and out against $0.60/$3.60 for Qwen 3.5. Billed on Allocate: $0.64/$3.85 against $0.64/$3.85, list plus 7%.
Which has the bigger context window?
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B NVFP4: 512,288 tokens (512K) against 262,144 (256K) for Qwen 3.5.
Can I fine-tune NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B NVFP4 or Qwen 3.5?
Qwen 3.5 publishes open weights (Apache 2.0) and can be fine-tuned on your own data. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B NVFP4 is a closed model served over API; its weights are not available.
Related comparisons
Run the numbers on your workload
Or don’t choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.