Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Turbo vs Qwen2 72B Instruct
On provider list prices, Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Turbo costs $0.88 per million input tokens against $0.90 for Qwen2 72B Instruct: effectively level. Output is $0.88 against $0.90. On Allocate both bill at list plus the 7% transaction fee.
Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-08. Billed price is list plus the 7% transaction fee.
What the numbers say
Take 1,000,000 requests a month at 1,200 input and 350 output tokens each. That workload costs $1,364 a month on Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Turbo and $1,395 on Qwen2 72B Instruct at list: a gap of $31.
Qwen2 72B Instruct reads 32K tokens per request against 8K for Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Turbo, 4.0x the window. That decides which one can take whole documents without splitting them.
Choose Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Turbo for
- The lower list price ($0.88 in / $0.88 out per M tokens)
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Turbo or Qwen2 72B Instruct?
Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Turbo, on this workload shape. At list prices it is $0.88/$0.88 per million tokens in and out against $0.90/$0.90 for Qwen2 72B Instruct. Billed on Allocate: $0.94/$0.94 against $0.96/$0.96, list plus 7%.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen2 72B Instruct: 32,768 tokens (32K) against 8,192 (8K) for Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Turbo.
Can I fine-tune Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Turbo or Qwen2 72B Instruct?
Both publish open weights (Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Turbo: Llama community; Qwen2 72B Instruct: Qwen license), so both can be fine-tuned. On Allocate the trained weights stay inside your boundary and belong to you.
Related comparisons
Run the numbers on your workload
Or don’t choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.