Comparisons

Llama 4 70B vs Inkling FP4

Llama 4 70B is not currently in the Allocate serving catalog, so this page lists no prices for it: every price on this site comes from the live catalog.

Llama 4 70B Inkling FP4
LabMetaThinking Machines
AccessNot served on AllocateOpen weights
Context windown/a512K tokens
List price, inputNot served$1 / M tokens
List price, outputNot served$4.05 / M tokens
Cached inputn/a$0.17 / M tokens
LicenseNot listedApache 2.0
Fine-tunableYesYes

Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-21.

Choose Llama 4 70B for

  • First private fine-tunes
  • Classification and extraction
  • On-boundary deployments
Llama 4 70B details

Choose Inkling FP4 for

  • Fine-tuning under a permissive license (Apache 2.0)
  • Published cached-input pricing ($0.17 per M tokens)
Inkling FP4 details

Common questions

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling FP4: 524,288 tokens (512K) against an unlisted window for Llama 4 70B.

Can I fine-tune Llama 4 70B or Inkling FP4?

Both publish open weights (Llama 4 70B: Not listed; Inkling FP4: Apache 2.0), so both can be fine-tuned. On Allocate the trained weights stay inside your boundary and belong to you.

Related comparisons

Run the numbers on your workload

Or don’t choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.