Comparisons

GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8

On provider list prices, Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5 per million input tokens against $5 for GPT-5.5: effectively level. Output is $25 against $30 (1.2x).

GPT-5.5 Claude Opus 4.8
LabOpenAIAnthropic
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context window400K tokens200K tokens
List price, input$5 / M tokens$5 / M tokens
List price, output$30 / M tokens$25 / M tokens
Cached input$0.5 / M tokensn/a
LicenseProprietary APIProprietary API
Fine-tunableNoNo

Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-21.

What the numbers say

Take 1,000,000 requests a month at 1,200 input and 350 output tokens each. That workload costs $14,750 a month on Claude Opus 4.8 and $16,500 on GPT-5.5 at list: a gap of $1,750.

GPT-5.5 reads 400K tokens per request against 200K for Claude Opus 4.8, 2.0x the window. That decides which one can take whole documents without splitting them.

GPT-5.5$5$30
Claude Opus 4.8$5$25
InputOutput

Choose GPT-5.5 for

  • Complex tool-using agents
  • Code generation
  • General assistants
GPT-5.5 details

Choose Claude Opus 4.8 for

  • Hardest reasoning problems
  • High-stakes analysis
  • Escalation tier for agents
Claude Opus 4.8 details

Common questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 or Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.8, on this workload shape. At list prices it is $5/$25 per million tokens in and out against $5/$30 for GPT-5.5. Billed on Allocate: $5.35/$26.75 against $5.35/$32.10.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.5: 400,000 tokens (400K) against 200,000 (200K) for Claude Opus 4.8.

Can I fine-tune GPT-5.5 or Claude Opus 4.8?

No. Both are closed models served over API. If you want a model you can train and own, start from an open-weights base in the catalog.

Related comparisons

Run the numbers on your workload

Or don’t choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.