Comparisons /

Veo 3.0 with audio vs Kimi K2.5

Veo 3.0 with audio is not currently in the Allocate serving catalog, so this page lists no prices for it: every price on this site comes from the live catalog.

Veo 3.0 with audio Kimi K2.5
LabGoogleTogethercomputer
AccessNot served on AllocateOpen weights
Context windown/a256K tokens
List price, inputNot served$0.5 / M tokens
List price, outputNot served$2.8 / M tokens
Cached inputn/an/a
LicenseProprietary APINot listed
Fine-tunableNoYes

Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-09-12.

Choose Veo 3.0 with audio for

  • Clips that need sound
  • Social video
  • Ad drafts
Veo 3.0 with audio details →

Choose Kimi K2.5 for

  • Whole-document reasoning
  • Long-context retrieval
  • Open-weight fine-tuning
Kimi K2.5 details →

Common questions

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.5: 262,144 tokens (256K) against an unlisted window for Veo 3.0 with audio.

Can I fine-tune Veo 3.0 with audio or Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 publishes open weights (Not listed) and can be fine-tuned on your own data. Veo 3.0 with audio is a closed model served over API; its weights are not available.

Related comparisons

Run the numbers on your workload

Or do not choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.