Comparisons /

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Inkling FP4

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is not currently in the Allocate serving catalog, so this page lists no prices for it: every price on this site comes from the live catalog.

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Inkling FP4
LabGoogleThinking Machines
AccessNot served on AllocateOpen weights
Context windown/a512K tokens
List price, inputNot served$1 / M tokens
List price, outputNot served$4.05 / M tokens
Cached inputn/a$0.17 / M tokens
LicenseNot listedApache 2.0
Fine-tunableYesYes

Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-09-12.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instruct for

  • Cheap classification
  • On-device and edge deployments
  • High-volume short prompts
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct details →

Choose Inkling FP4 for

  • Fine-tuning under a permissive license (Apache 2.0)
  • Published cached-input pricing ($0.17 per M tokens)
Inkling FP4 details →

Common questions

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling FP4: 524,288 tokens (512K) against an unlisted window for Gemma 3n E4B Instruct.

Can I fine-tune Gemma 3n E4B Instruct or Inkling FP4?

Both publish open weights (Gemma 3n E4B Instruct: Not listed; Inkling FP4: Apache 2.0), so both can be fine-tuned. On Allocate the trained weights stay inside your boundary and belong to you.

Related comparisons

Run the numbers on your workload

Or do not choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.