# Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

On provider list prices, Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens against $0.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash: effectively level. Output is $3.75 against $3.75.

## Specifications

| | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Lab | Google | Google |
| Access | API only | API only |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| List price, input | $0.75 / M tokens | $0.75 / M tokens |
| List price, output | $3.75 / M tokens | $3.75 / M tokens |
| Cached input | $0.075 / M tokens | n/a |
| License | Proprietary API | Proprietary API |
| Fine-tunable | No | No |

Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-21.

## What the numbers say

Take 1,000,000 requests a month at 1,200 input and 350 output tokens each. That workload costs $2,213 a month on Gemini 3.6 Flash and $2,213 on Gemini 3.7 Flash at list: a gap of $0.

## Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash for

- Published cached-input pricing ($0.075 per M tokens)

## Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash for

- Frontier serving with no weights to manage

## Common questions

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash, on this workload shape. At list prices it is $0.75/$3.75 per million tokens in and out against $0.75/$3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash. Billed on Allocate: $0.80/$4.01 against $0.80/$4.01.

### Which has the bigger context window?

They match: both read 1,000,000 tokens (1M) per request.

### Can I fine-tune Gemini 3.6 Flash or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

No. Both are closed models served over API. If you want a model you can train and own, start from an open-weights base in the catalog.

---

[HTML page](https://allocate.network/compare/google-gemini-3-6-flash-vs-google-gemini-3-7-flash) · [Gemini 3.6 Flash](https://allocate.network/models/google-gemini-3-6-flash.md) · [Gemini 3.7 Flash](https://allocate.network/models/google-gemini-3-7-flash.md) · [Machine-readable catalog](https://allocate.network/catalog.json)