Comparisons

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5

On provider list prices, Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens against $3 for Claude Sonnet 5: 2.0x apart. Output is $9 against $15 (1.7x).

Gemini 3.5 Flash Claude Sonnet 5
LabGoogleAnthropic
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
List price, input$1.5 / M tokens$3 / M tokens
List price, output$9 / M tokens$15 / M tokens
Cached inputn/an/a
LicenseProprietary APIProprietary API
Fine-tunableNoNo

Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-21.

What the numbers say

Take 1,000,000 requests a month at 1,200 input and 350 output tokens each. That workload costs $4,950 a month on Gemini 3.5 Flash and $8,850 on Claude Sonnet 5 at list: a gap of $3,900, or 1.8x.

Gemini 3.5 Flash$1.50$9
Claude Sonnet 5$3$15
InputOutput

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash for

  • High-volume support and triage
  • Document extraction at scale
  • Vision and OCR pipelines
Gemini 3.5 Flash details

Choose Claude Sonnet 5 for

  • Judgment calls with policy context
  • Customer-facing writing
  • Review and escalation flows
Claude Sonnet 5 details

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude Sonnet 5?

Gemini 3.5 Flash, on this workload shape. At list prices it is $1.50/$9 per million tokens in and out against $3/$15 for Claude Sonnet 5. Billed on Allocate: $1.60/$9.63 against $3.21/$16.05.

Which has the bigger context window?

They match: both read 1,000,000 tokens (1M) per request.

Can I fine-tune Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude Sonnet 5?

No. Both are closed models served over API. If you want a model you can train and own, start from an open-weights base in the catalog.

Related comparisons

Run the numbers on your workload

Or don’t choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.