Comparisons

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.5

On provider list prices, Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens against $5 for GPT-5.5: 3.3x apart. Output is $9 against $30 (3.3x).

Gemini 3.5 Flash GPT-5.5
LabGoogleOpenAI
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context window1M tokens400K tokens
List price, input$1.5 / M tokens$5 / M tokens
List price, output$9 / M tokens$30 / M tokens
Cached inputn/a$0.5 / M tokens
LicenseProprietary APIProprietary API
Fine-tunableNoNo

Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-21.

What the numbers say

Take 1,000,000 requests a month at 1,200 input and 350 output tokens each. That workload costs $4,950 a month on Gemini 3.5 Flash and $16,500 on GPT-5.5 at list: a gap of $11,550, or 3.3x.

Gemini 3.5 Flash reads 1M tokens per request against 400K for GPT-5.5, 2.5x the window. That decides which one can take whole documents without splitting them.

Gemini 3.5 Flash$1.50$9
GPT-5.5$5$30
InputOutput

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash for

  • High-volume support and triage
  • Document extraction at scale
  • Vision and OCR pipelines
Gemini 3.5 Flash details

Choose GPT-5.5 for

  • Complex tool-using agents
  • Code generation
  • General assistants
GPT-5.5 details

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.5?

Gemini 3.5 Flash, on this workload shape. At list prices it is $1.50/$9 per million tokens in and out against $5/$30 for GPT-5.5. Billed on Allocate: $1.60/$9.63 against $5.35/$32.10.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens (1M) against 400,000 (400K) for GPT-5.5.

Can I fine-tune Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.5?

No. Both are closed models served over API. If you want a model you can train and own, start from an open-weights base in the catalog.

Related comparisons

Run the numbers on your workload

Or don’t choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.