DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout
On provider list prices, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens against $0.18 for Llama 4 Scout: 1.2x apart. Output is $0.60 against $0.59.
Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-21.
What the numbers say
Take 1,000,000 requests a month at 1,200 input and 350 output tokens each. That workload costs $390 a month on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $422.50 on Llama 4 Scout at list: a gap of $32.50.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for
- The lower list price ($0.15 in / $0.60 out per M tokens)
Choose Llama 4 Scout for
- Whole-document reasoning
- High-volume extraction
- Fine-tuning under the Llama 4 license
Common questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, on this workload shape. At list prices it is $0.15/$0.60 per million tokens in and out against $0.18/$0.59 for Llama 4 Scout. Billed on Allocate: $0.16/$0.64 against $0.19/$0.63.
Which has the bigger context window?
They match: both read 1,048,576 tokens (1M) per request.
Can I fine-tune DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?
Both publish open weights (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Not listed; Llama 4 Scout: Llama community), so both can be fine-tuned. On Allocate the trained weights stay inside your boundary and belong to you.
Related comparisons
Run the numbers on your workload
Or do not choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.