AllocateDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Grok Build 0.1
On provider list prices, Grok Build 0.1 costs $1 per million input tokens against $1.60 for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B: 1.6x apart. Output is $2 against $1.60.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Grok Build 0.1Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-21.
What the numbers say
Take 1,000,000 requests a month at 1,200 input and 350 output tokens each. That workload costs $1,900 a month on Grok Build 0.1 and $2,480 on DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B at list: a gap of $580, or 1.3x.
Grok Build 0.1 reads 256K tokens per request against 128K for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B, 2.0x the window. That decides which one can take whole documents without splitting them.
Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B for
- Open weights you can fine-tune and own
- Fine-tuning under a permissive license (MIT)
Choose Grok Build 0.1 for
- The lower list price ($1 in / $2 out per M tokens)
- The longer context window (256K vs 128K tokens)
- Published cached-input pricing ($0.20 per M tokens)
Common questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1, on this workload shape. At list prices it is $1/$2 per million tokens in and out against $1.60/$1.60 for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B. Billed on Allocate: $1.07/$2.14 against $1.71/$1.71.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok Build 0.1: 256,000 tokens (256K) against 131,072 (128K) for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B.
Can I fine-tune DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Grok Build 0.1?
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B publishes open weights (MIT) and can be fine-tuned on your own data. Grok Build 0.1 is a closed model served over API; its weights are not available.
Related comparisons
Run the numbers on your workload
Or don’t choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.