Comparisons /

Cogito v2.1 671B vs GLM 5.2

Cogito v2.1 671B is not currently in the Allocate serving catalog, so this page lists no prices for it: every price on this site comes from the live catalog.

C Cogito v2.1 671BG GLM 5.2
LabDeep CogitoZ.ai
AccessNot served on AllocateOpen weights
Context windown/a1M tokens
List price, inputNot served$1.4 / M tokens
List price, outputNot served$4.4 / M tokens
Cached inputn/a$0.26 / M tokens
LicenseNot listedNot listed
Fine-tunableYesYes

Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-09-12.

Choose Cogito v2.1 671B for

  • Long reasoning chains
  • Open-weight agents
  • Self-hosted reasoning
Cogito v2.1 671B details →

Choose GLM 5.2 for

  • Agents on open weights
  • Code and structured outputs
  • Fine-tuning toward an owned model
GLM 5.2 details →

Common questions

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM 5.2: 1,048,575 tokens (1M) against an unlisted window for Cogito v2.1 671B.

Can I fine-tune Cogito v2.1 671B or GLM 5.2?

Both publish open weights (Cogito v2.1 671B: Not listed; GLM 5.2: Not listed), so both can be fine-tuned. On Allocate the trained weights stay inside your boundary and belong to you.

Related comparisons

Run the numbers on your workload

Or do not choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.