AllocateCogito v2.1 671B vs Qwen2-VL (72B) Instruct
On provider list prices, Qwen2-VL (72B) Instruct costs $1.20 per million input tokens against $1.25 for Cogito v2.1 671B: effectively level. Output is $1.20 against $1.25. On Allocate both bill at list plus the 7% transaction fee.
Qwen2-VL (72B) InstructSpecifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-07-08. Billed price is list plus the 7% transaction fee.
What the numbers say
Take 1,000,000 requests a month at 1,200 input and 350 output tokens each. That workload costs $1,860 a month on Qwen2-VL (72B) Instruct and $1,938 on Cogito v2.1 671B at list: a gap of $77.50.
Cogito v2.1 671B reads 160K tokens per request against 32K for Qwen2-VL (72B) Instruct, 5.0x the window. That decides which one can take whole documents without splitting them.
Choose Qwen2-VL (72B) Instruct for
- The lower list price ($1.20 in / $1.20 out per M tokens)
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Cogito v2.1 671B or Qwen2-VL (72B) Instruct?
Qwen2-VL (72B) Instruct, on this workload shape. At list prices it is $1.20/$1.20 per million tokens in and out against $1.25/$1.25 for Cogito v2.1 671B. Billed on Allocate: $1.28/$1.28 against $1.34/$1.34, list plus 7%.
Which has the bigger context window?
Cogito v2.1 671B: 163,840 tokens (160K) against 32,768 (32K) for Qwen2-VL (72B) Instruct.
Can I fine-tune Cogito v2.1 671B or Qwen2-VL (72B) Instruct?
Both publish open weights (Cogito v2.1 671B: Not listed; Qwen2-VL (72B) Instruct: Qwen license), so both can be fine-tuned. On Allocate the trained weights stay inside your boundary and belong to you.
Related comparisons
Run the numbers on your workload
Or don’t choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.