AllocateCogito v2.1 671B vs DeepSeek R1 0528 NVFP4
Cogito v2.1 671B is not currently in the Allocate serving catalog, so this page lists no prices for it: every price on this site comes from the live catalog.
C Cogito v2.1 671B
DeepSeek R1 0528 NVFP4
DeepSeek R1 0528 NVFP4LabDeep CogitoDeepseek
AccessNot served on AllocateOpen weights
Context windown/a160K tokens
List price, inputNot served$3 / M tokens
List price, outputNot served$7 / M tokens
Cached inputn/an/a
LicenseNot listedMIT
Fine-tunableYesYes
Specifications and provider list prices from the Allocate catalog, checked 2026-09-12.
Choose Cogito v2.1 671B for
- Long reasoning chains
- Open-weight agents
- Self-hosted reasoning
Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 NVFP4 for
- Fine-tuning under a permissive license (MIT)
Common questions
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek R1 0528 NVFP4: 163,840 tokens (160K) against an unlisted window for Cogito v2.1 671B.
Can I fine-tune Cogito v2.1 671B or DeepSeek R1 0528 NVFP4?
Both publish open weights (Cogito v2.1 671B: Not listed; DeepSeek R1 0528 NVFP4: MIT), so both can be fine-tuned. On Allocate the trained weights stay inside your boundary and belong to you.
Related comparisons
Cogito v2.1 671B vs Kimi K2.7 CodeCogito v2.1 671B vs Inkling FP4DeepSeek R1 0528 NVFP4 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek R1 0528 NVFP4 vs Inkling FP4Cogito v2.1 671B vs DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek R1 0528 NVFP4 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Run the numbers on your workload
Or do not choose. On Allocate a route name is the contract: point yours at one model today, swap to the other tomorrow, and compare them on your live traffic with per-token metering.